zuko's voice simp

skull-bearer:

ndragoon:

dduane:

Report: Potential NYT lawsuit could force OpenAI to wipe ChatGPT and start over

OpenAI could be fined up to $150,000 for each piece of infringing content.

Ars Technica

Well, this would be interesting…

This will be amazing, though!

Just think about it:

We are in the era after it caused SO MUCH, and caused so many sites to put in blocks and other restrictions to stop it from scraping everything

If they are forced to wipe their entire dataset then they won’t be able to get even a fraction of it back!

Not only that, but they would be forced to get permission of the owners for everything they use. Which would IMO, actually kill most of the issues with AI and actually make the technology into something actually useful.

(via spontaneousmusicalnumber)

venividivictorious:

anyway jaskier is like. basically the human equivalent of those wild animals someone feeds who’ve lost all fear of people and now just break into houses to eat out of the trash and chill in the pool

he’s been travelling with a witcher since he was 18. he has zero fear of any of them. he associates witchers with Having Things Done For Him and Being Provided For and Give Love. he has no reservations whatsoever about going up to any random witcher he happens to pass when geralt isn’t around and asking them to help him with something or do something for him or just. trailing after them for a while because he knows if he whines perfectly on pitch they’ll hunt his dinner and store his shit in their horse’s saddlebags and keep him safe on the road, even if they’re grumpy about it. at kaer morhen he is like the stray cat geralt fed one time and now everyone is just like “well he lives here now i guess”. it just Does Not Occur to him that he might ever be in danger with a witcher around. this is a man who finds things lying around in the kaer morhen lab and just fucking. eats them

anyway. those “please do not feed the animals it teaches them to approach people” signs but. for jaskier and the oxenfurt students who start trying to imitate him and adopt a witcher

(via mikkeneko)

pommancy:

He wasn’t alone anymore

(via thebackhill)

guiltycrunch:

orowyrm:

orowyrm:

dear god please let our new baby octopus feel confident enough to move out of her corner hiding spot today while i’m on exhibits so i can see her properly for the first time amen

she stuck out a single arm before changing her mind and deciding the rest of the tank is too scary, far too scary by far she is scared

(via feraligatr)

vyscera:

vyscera:

the garden i tend at work is getting overrun with snails so i thought about a world where we acquired a domesticated a “working dog” breed of hammerhead worm (they eat snails and slugs and worms) that is also. a puppy. Bred to clear vegetation of common slimy garden pests. click under readmore if u wanna see the worm theyre based off of i think theyre really cute

Itch.io / Redbubble / INPRNT / Twitter / Patreon  

Keep reading

Thank u guys for all the wormdog love T_T i did more

The top one is if the wormdog from the og post (that me and my irl coworker have nicknamed Mug) if he ate all the damn snails terrorizing the garden and grew big and strong. the second one shows how wormdogs come in all sorts of shapes and colors :) bc i wanted to draw more. which one would u adopt

(via bunjywunjy)

quasi-normalcy:

communistkenobi:

i understand you guys now. like i get it

I feel like this is even better when you know that the context is that they’ve just seem three spectral hags emerge from the fog to recite a prophecy of doom that mentions Captain Kirk by name.

(via wizard-email)

yeats-nana:

octoswan:

octoswan:

NASA warns alien life may not be fuckable

WASHINGTON - Following a recent uptick in UFO interest, NASA cautioned curious citizens against the notion that extraterrestrial life will b

The Beaverton

Originally posted by teathattast

actually you know what, valid

Aliens: [finally contacts with NASA and wants to know more about the human race]

(via featherfur)

theunitofcaring:

So how do you tell which parts of your routine are load-bearing? I wish I knew, but some heuristics:

Things that are part of your access to food which you’ll reliably eat are often load-bearing. If you get a lot of your calories from the free food at work, you should expect changing jobs to one without free food will throw you off your game. If you rely on the corner store then you should expect that moving to a new place where you have to get in the car to get groceries will be a problem. Going vegetarian can screw up something load-bearing for a lot of people (and I say that as someone who believes that factory farming is morally horrible). Going on a diet is reasonably likely to fuck up something load bearing, and I suspect this is part of why statistically dieting doesn’t work at improving peoples’ lives or health.

Things that are part of the environments you spend the most time in are reasonably likely to be load-bearing.The length of your commute, the environment you work in, whether your bedroom is clean, well-ventilated, high-ceilinged, has natural light, whether you have any space that you don’t share with another person…. for some people ‘having a car’ is loadbearing because it’s a space that is theirs and will reliably have their stuff and get them places. For other people, living somewhere where they can get places without a car is load bearing. 

Cleanliness needs are often load-bearing. This one especially sucks because you can get into a trap where your space gets chaotic/cluttered/awful and this breaks your brain and makes it harder to keep your space clean.

Pets are often load-bearing.

This might be influenced by who I hang out with, but I think personal time when you’re alone and no one has any claims on you is load bearing for a lot of people. Some people have their own room and know they need their own room, but lots of other people make do with a long commute where they can quietly listen to the radio, and don’t even realize that this is filling their need for introvert time until it changes. 

I think people often have a particularly bad time if they have something load-bearing that’s considered ‘indulgent’ or a ‘luxury’, like ‘living in an apartment building with a pool’ or ‘having a big yard I can garden in’ or ‘having an ensuite bathroom with a tub’ or ‘having a soundproofed practice room’ or ‘having a grand piano’. But, like, having expensive load-bearing bits of your life does not say anything about you morally; it may mean that it’s harder for you to get your needs met, and it may not be a preferable situation, but it doesn’t make you selfish or greedy or bad. And, you know, trying to just not have things you need because you believe you’re bad for wanting them doesn’t often work out great.

(via shanastoryteller)

diablo-and-cito:

@spanish-moth

Dawww your welcome. I will keep on posting to share the fluff and make peopel smile.

Here a royal fluffball cleaning her foot and than scratching her ear.